# dnscrypt holland no logging server and dnssec support # dnscrypt france no logging server and dnssec support # fvz london server, slow, no dnssec support I am in the uk, I did some testing and made comment in my dnsmasq file which will serve to remind me of why specific server been used. Mar 03 18:45:51 _ systemd: Listening on dnscrypt-proxy listening socket. Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/dnscrypt-proxy.socket enabled vendor preset: disabled)ĭrop-In: /etc/systemd/system/ * dnscrypt-proxy.socket - dnscrypt-proxy listening socket Mar 03 18:45:51 _ dnscrypt-proxy: Chosen certificate #1435874751 is valid from to Mar 03 18:45:51 _ dnscrypt-proxy: - logs your activity - a different provider might be better a choice if privacy is a concern
Mar 03 18:45:51 _ dnscrypt-proxy: - does not support DNS Security Extensions `-13867 /usr/bin/dnscrypt-proxy -ephemeral-keys -resolver-name=cisco -local-address=127.0.0.1:41 -user=nobody Loaded: loaded (/etc/systemd/system/rvice enabled vendor preset: disabled)ĭrop-In: /etc/systemd/system/ĬGroup: /system.slice/rvice Mar 03 18:45:51 _ dnscrypt-proxy: Chosen certificate #808464433 is valid from to Mar 03 18:45:51 _ dnscrypt-proxy: This certificate is valid Mar 03 18:45:51 _ dnscrypt-proxy: Ephemeral keys enabled - generating a new seed Mar 03 18:45:51 _ dnscrypt-proxy: Starting dnscrypt-proxy 1.6.1 Mar 03 18:45:51 _ dnscrypt-proxy: + Provider supposedly doesn't keep logs Mar 03 18:45:51 _ dnscrypt-proxy: + DNS Security Extensions are supported Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/rvice disabled vendor preset: disabled)ĭrop-In: /etc/systemd/system/Īctive: active (running) since Thu 18:45:51 CET 1min 32s agoĬGroup: /system.slice/rvice For asian users, Poland is still better than France e.g. Some people prefer Poland because it's network-wise closer to them, e.g.
Or OpenDNS if you trust them as they do provide DNSCrypt.Īs usual, it's not the destination location itself that matters, it's the path and border routing, so I always suggest you do a ping and a mtr to see how a connection rates.ĭepends on your route and weather condition as always. Generally, the connections are very stable from what I saw, it's just latency being a key factor for DNS to be snappy gives you a vote for DNSCrypt EU (NL) if you want independent DNSCrypt. Best not because I run it and trust myself, but actualy the least latent.
In my home case, DNSCrypt Poland is actually the best option with 8 ms.
Those are measurements from a servers, measurements from home through an ISP will be worse for sure. Google (8.8.8.8 I get 5 ms (great, but google, doesn't break NX AFAIK) OpenDNS (208.67.222.222) I get <1 ms! (cool, has DNS, but is a corpo and breaks NX records) Apart from interesting exceptions it's usually best to choose geographically-close services, so NL should be best for you then.Īs I have some servers across europe to test ping latency from, I did a test from a server in NL to: